Editor in Chief: Moh. Reza Huwaida Friday, February 15th, 2019

Avoiding Setbacks in Democratic Achievements

After the downfall of Taliban in Afghanistan, the system that emerged in Afghanistan was said to be based on democracy; however, even after 17 years, the country has not been able to form a democratic system. And, now as the peace deal with Taliban are on the way, there are fears that the country will face further set back in this regard. Some fear that Taliban may not agree to the Constitution of Afghanistan that supports the democratic system in the country, Afghan government may give up their strict stance on limited democratic gains that have been achieved. Nevertheless, it is imperative that Afghan authorities, leaders and people as a whole must stand for democracy and try to further nurture it so that a true democracy can flourish in the country.
In order to save democracy, it is very important that there must be efforts to promote accountability and check the shift towards the authoritarian rule.  
In a democratic country the ultimate authority should lie within the people. And ultimately, the government should be answerable to the people. Moreover, to guarantee such accountability the modern democratic theory emphasizes to establish and strengthen political systems in such a way that people have most of the power, though indirectly. The underdeveloped and developing democracies must pursue the same theory to help promote better democratic systems. Afghanistan, being in a very primary stage of democracy should make efforts on the same principle. However, the democratic trends in Afghanistan are also under threat of authoritarian inclinations. 
One of the basic ways the people can participate in the affairs of the state is through elections. Well-established and developed election systems can provide opportunities to all the members of the society to cast their votes and have their say in the making of the government. However, in Afghanistan this basic institution of democracy has not been able to function appropriately. The last parliamentary and presidential elections were vehemently dominated by fraud, corruption and incapacity.
The proper and well-developed election process can play an important role in creating accountable government. A political party or a politician in order to be elected by the votes of the people tries to perform properly so that it gets chance of remaining in authority for a longer period of time. If the political parties and the contestants in the elections come to know that they can win the election even without the consent of the people, through illegal ways, they will never remain accountable to the people and would not care much about the public opinion. Afghan political scenario, at the moment, is facing almost a similar sort of situation.
Another issue of unaccountability arises when a system is made personality-oriented, wherein the individuals are prioritized on the basis of their actual or assumed personality traits. This property is mostly found in dictatorial and authoritarian forms of government. Such ideologies are basically the remnants of the monarchies that could be found long ago in human history.
The institutions, which can play a dominant role in establishing democratic culture and accountable system, are underestimated and even ignored in such systems. Our country Afghanistan happens to be a similar country. The democratic institutions are ignored to a great extent while the political system circulates around the personalities. Even the election system is designed is such a way that promotes personality-worship. The absence of political parties and their influence within election system have made many overlook the importance of political parties which happen to be very important institution for the growth and institutionalization of democracy.
It is also unfortunate to note that Afghan government structure has been formed in such a way that it is difficult to hold the presidential palace accountable for its policies and actions. As a matter of fact, accountability can be achieved when there is transparency and the rule of law. However, both these characteristics seem to be non-existent in Afghan society. Transparency and rule of law can be maintained when there is proper separation of power and the different organs of state can function on their own – independently. In fact, judiciary and law enforcement agencies must be capable to hold the law as the top priority matter. In Afghan political system the separation of powers is not clear and the judiciary is composed of what the government decides.
A thorough analysis of Afghanistan’s political scenario will depict that currently the political processes are also being kept aloof of accountability along with the institutions. The current efforts for the reconciliation and reintegration processes are very much non-participatory and non-transparent. As the major stakeholders are being kept away from the processes, a sort of ambiguity and distrust is being generated within different circles and the people of Afghanistan. Moreover, there is a disadvantage of such an approach as well – it is likely to result in improper and incomplete outcomes of the processes, which will further generate controversies. 
Afghan authorities have in fact kept on striving to limit the power and authority to themselves and, on certain occasions, have used the same irresponsibly. The need of time is to make the political institutions and processes accountable to the people through proper democratization of the political structure.